Make no mistake: this model *will* change—either after large destructive upheavals, or sooner, proactively. It’s up to Zuck where in the history books he wants to be. Besides, “those” people aren’t worth much to advertisers anyway and even poor people pay do for phones & minutes.https://twitter.com/matthewstoller/status/976808283334901760 …
-
-
Yep. Yep. And yep. https://twitter.com/iwv1/status/976816538291462144 …
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I agree with your second statement. Zuck needs to reconcile the desire to be a “neutral platform” that is the plumbing of the social internet and a very specific (and politicized) view for what “open and connected” means. He can’t have both.
-
This square isn’t going to circle and the choices are unavoidable. The sooner the better.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
It's all PR flak to obscure the criminality that lies behind Facebook's veneer. No-one should take a word Zuckerberg says seriously.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.