Make no mistake: this model *will* change—either after large destructive upheavals, or sooner, proactively. It’s up to Zuck where in the history books he wants to be. Besides, “those” people aren’t worth much to advertisers anyway and even poor people pay do for phones & minutes.https://twitter.com/matthewstoller/status/976808283334901760 …
-
-
They must then have close to zero influence on anything of importance. Otherwise what is this talk of building “a” community of a user-base of two billion? It’s not just very very wrong and naive—it’s a dangerous way for a social media company to think.https://twitter.com/beh_zod/status/976814381085454336 …
Show this thread -
Yep. Yep. And yep. https://twitter.com/iwv1/status/976816538291462144 …
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"Community" is the happy friendly term thats used instead of "user base"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Facebook has sociologists, very good ones. They’re working hard to prevent these kinds of things. But a handful of people in 25,000 can’t solve all of this.
-
lol the defensive reply coming in from the guy whose company just handed over ALL private messages to their boss/employer/admin.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
They lie, blatantly and in your face, and get no consequences for it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Today he says community, he used to say utility. One day someone told him utilities are regulated.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Our man in Palo Alto needs help of all sorts, not just a sociologist
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.