Google and Facebook are among the best in the world for security, for example, but not necessarily privacy. Signal combines both, as far as we can tell. Some private communication channels don’t seem very secure. Etc.
-
-
Show this thread
-
There is stuff fiddling with settings helps; there’s stuff that a good security team helps; privacy-by-design always helps (but isn’t without some trade-offs); and then there’s stuff settings and teams can’t mitigate.
Show this thread -
Being careful with explanations helps because conceptual clarity helps identify the political and economic dimensions of the issue—subject to democratic governance—and also consider what kind of technical investment/infrastructure is needed.
Show this thread -
Name, zip code, date of birth=match to voter rolls. Facebook data is easily matched for most to voter rolls.https://twitter.com/misgatos/status/976283361470685184 …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I believe we have a critical communication issue at hand. Technologists are referencing our rights to privacy in a post private world. We must evolve our messaging and call for the quantification of personal data and make reporting that tied to opt in practices.
-
Jaron Lanier agrees with you: https://youtu.be/XdEuII9cv-U?t=3m12s … Who owns your data? You do. If you generate the data point, you should get the proceeds.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This is why I started
#SOULprize, your@TEDTalks gave me hope that people might see what is happening. I could really use your help!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.