For most of human history, governments were not able to perform investigations post-hoc targeted/criminal interest, and we lived mostly through ephemeral interaction with some exceptions. We might alter a bit of this, but the current maximal model isn't natural or even that old.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Without all the data collection and this kind of opaque micro-targeting targeting, you wouldn't need to investigate IRA like this. Whatever it tried to do would be a lot more visible *while* it was happening.
0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Anonymity, privacy and data permanence have trade-offs for sure, but once again, you can imagine structures that manage this trade-off much better & explicitly. I think there is a political moment which rewards non-anonymity in interaction but keeps pseudonimity. Underexplored.
1 reply 0 retweets 9 likes
My point is that we are neither properly discussing these trade-offs or creating structures that manage them, and give us better choices. I'd like some real disruption and innovation.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.