What I can piece together: Clinton had an in-house algorithm/data decision team, while Parscale (no team, less money) went with what Facebook offered (fairly routinely) to big clients. Clinton team seems to have been particularly sub-par and Facebook does offer *a lot*.¯\_(ツ)_/¯https://twitter.com/WIRED/status/968512992873799682 …
-
-
-
Trump had a much smaller, lagging organization assembled much later and haphazardly. It also seems clear that they turned over most of their work to Facebook's politics team and the platform itself which did a lot of heavy lifting for them. https://twitter.com/rmmageddon/status/968635817517375489 …
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Big ? still for Mueller: did CA or Trump campaign directly get help/coordination from Russia? i.e. did bots amplify the ads/messages from Trump or pay for similar ads. We know all Clinton related campaigning but not all pro-Trump or anti-Hillary spend
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
One other conspiracy theory -- was anyone on the Clinton data team compromised such that the campaign data operation was either altered or misrepresented in any way to change campaign targeting/strategy
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.