The Silicon Valley model that privacy can be negotiated person by person rather as a whole with full externalities: networked, without practical obscurity, searchable, mass, permanent etc, is 100% wrong. (Fitness company opened up data and unearthed secret US bases. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ )https://twitter.com/Paulmd199/status/957795392933961728 …
-
-
Nobody knows what machine learning will be able fairly successfully to infer about what set of data in the future, and what piece plays what role. People have hard time comprehending what a searchable database of many people's data reveal, etc. THERE IS NO INFORMED CONSENT HERE.
Show this thread -
"Check your privacy settings"—which is your standard Silicon Valley response—is no response. In the digital age, data privacy simply cannot be negotiated and consented to at the individual level. (Let alone via wrap-around, click-through, as-is legalese).https://twitter.com/LizSly/status/957743336818954240 …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Even if informed consent were possible, designers continue to apply implied consent patterns to terms and conditions, etc. I dare any company to publicize how many people open the t&c page linked next to the opt-in checkboxes in their forms!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
People have to control over their data & the default must be no collection. If companies cannot explain clearly & honestly what they or any other party does with it, without forcing it or implying it, then they cannot collect or process personal data.
#ePrivacy#DoNotTrackThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
