This ranking looks right to me...https://twitter.com/benedictevans/status/941719816024473600 …
@BenedictEvans Ranking is right, list is missing risks from AI *non*-bias—it works well, allowing (especially the powerful because that’s how it works) do things at scale that was previously unattainable.
-
-
Think what digitizing records did to practical obscurity, apply to decision–making and optimization.
-
it's funny but it's actually way wrong. The first worry should be that by using ai instead of brains we will lose mental abilities we already have, and not develop even more through generations as we would without ai
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The perfect panopticon is certainly an issue and I have written a little about it. But it doesn’t come up much, and not just in the Valley.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Like most tech, the problem is rooted in a lack of public discusion about it's ethical use, not the tech itself. If it can help us better diagnose diseases, it's probably worth investing in it's development.http://bit.ly/2xJujAa
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.