I wrote a piece for a mainstream outlet (not the NYT), mentioning the sexual assault allegations against Roy Moore. Some nervous lawyer edited it to "sexual misconduct." I said, okay, pull my piece. They reverted back to "sexual assault." Writers, don't let them lawyer you down.
-
Show this thread
-
By the way, I think it is appropriate to be careful, and not unduly smear people with allegations and accusations, but it is ridiculous to claim that we cannot correctly describe the accusations especially after multiple non-anonymous accusers have come forward. Spine up, media.
4 replies 94 retweets 672 likesShow this thread -
zeynep tufekci Retweeted Jon Stevens-Hall
Not correctly distinguishing between the severity of the situation, too, is a great disservice to both victims and accused! Accused of molesting minors is not in the same universe as many of the other accusations. It all matters, but so does severity.https://twitter.com/JonHall_/status/938122683530825728 …
zeynep tufekci added,
5 replies 44 retweets 341 likesShow this thread -
Look, there is a whole range of human "misconduct". We can get mad at it all. Some, we try to forgive, move on. Some cross such a line that we have laws, and even when the law does not work as it should, we remain in recoil. Blur that line, and society will become unlivable.
2 replies 27 retweets 234 likesShow this thread -
zeynep tufekci Retweeted Alex Bowles
Yes though a flood of false accusations *can* be used to smear, too. I *do* think we should worry about protecting basic rights of the accused, too, especially in the age of social media. But no "one simple rule" to get out of using judgment.https://twitter.com/alexqgb/status/938128880313032707 …
zeynep tufekci added,
3 replies 11 retweets 135 likesShow this thread -
I want to clarify: obfuscation of allegations of serious crimes by conflating them with much less severe ones is a form of censorship. It's censorship by conflation. That's why I couldn't put my name on it. This isn't taking a giant stance; it's a basic responsibility.
5 replies 50 retweets 274 likesShow this thread -
zeynep tufekci Retweeted Sherri
Yes, women coming together to find a common voice represent a breakthrough; it will be attacked via false claims, challenging credibility, victim wearing down, and conflating types of assault/misconduct. That's actually what my piece is about!https://twitter.com/sjellis_0220/status/938222208639434752 …
zeynep tufekci added,
2 replies 18 retweets 104 likesShow this thread -
Positive update: the editor at the outlet has contacted me, and they are assuring me that they will fix the procedure so that lawyer changes go through editors (with news judgment!) so the default isn't censorship by pointless, legalistic caution.
3 replies 6 retweets 105 likesShow this thread
zeynep tufekci Retweeted matt blaze
It wasn't in the title but in the piece but whenever I can, I negotiate title as hard as I can, and recommend everyone try to do so! Title is what most people see of your piece! Shouldn't be unilaterally up to the publication.https://twitter.com/mattblaze/status/938196388386615297 …
zeynep tufekci added,
-
-
zeynep tufekci Retweeted Ahmet Alp Balkan
"Misconduct" covers such a wide range that I believe using the word to lump together everything from the smallest transgression to sexual assault, molestation of minors and rape is a form of censorship via conflation, and corruption of thought.https://twitter.com/ahmetb/status/938145445305466880 …
zeynep tufekci added,
4 replies 24 retweets 92 likesShow this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
