I wrote a piece for a mainstream outlet (not the NYT), mentioning the sexual assault allegations against Roy Moore. Some nervous lawyer edited it to "sexual misconduct." I said, okay, pull my piece. They reverted back to "sexual assault." Writers, don't let them lawyer you down.
-
-
It wasn't in the title but in the piece but whenever I can, I negotiate title as hard as I can, and recommend everyone try to do so! Title is what most people see of your piece! Shouldn't be unilaterally up to the publication.https://twitter.com/mattblaze/status/938196388386615297 …
Show this thread -
"Misconduct" covers such a wide range that I believe using the word to lump together everything from the smallest transgression to sexual assault, molestation of minors and rape is a form of censorship via conflation, and corruption of thought.https://twitter.com/ahmetb/status/938145445305466880 …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Excellent news. I wish more mainstream outlets would follow suit.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What is the outlet where lawyers have the ability to edit copy without an editor being involved?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
