Yes. News can totally be covered without doing it in the killer’s terms—maximal, useless attention on the shooter. https://twitter.com/holden/status/927345233360076800 …
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread
-
This is the recommendation of so many experts in this field. Deny them the sensationalism they seek. Enough already. https://twitter.com/Abt_Thomas/status/927541831356829696 …
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread -
This isn't calling for some censorship. It's not that hard to implement. Media already does this, successfully, for suicide reporting
Show this thread -
Media: we learn almost nothing from your profiles of the killers—except you help inspire the next one. Here's the story: guns and attention.
Show this thread -
I'm for naming, but not sensationalizing. Bury the name, focus on victims. Profiles can't & don't stop conspiracies. https://twitter.com/Koreandogwood/status/927555785684606977 …
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread -
Here's a thread with my long-form writing on how media is helping fuel copycat mass murders, with links to research.https://twitter.com/zeynep/status/914814143068241920 …
Show this thread -
Absolutely. Report the news, focus on the victims and the structural issues that fuel escalation.https://twitter.com/sandy_research/status/927559931569561601 …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
What prohibition? They all editorially decide what to put on push alerts. Put the name in the story without making it so central.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.