At the time, it was dominant, yet it failed. That’s the point. Things pass. And today, on mobile, people do not only use FB
In fact, I argue that it's not the broad wants that that change, but what's possible *given* relative stability of human wants/dynamics.
-
-
People want community; platform affordances influence what kind of community can be formed. Once formed—those communities have consequences.pic.twitter.com/JCjzZICDA3
-
And shifting of possible paths thru micro-shaping, if you will? It can lead societies in very different paths over time. Micro is not weak.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
And I argue those are the opposite of stable
-
At a fundamental level? Pretty stable. Belonging, status, community, etc. Maslow treated like a joke, but it's good—but layers more mixed.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.