Saying that Facebook controls what’s in the newsfeed is really no more correct than saying Google controls what’s in search results.
-
Show this thread
-
Yep. There a large number of potential equilibra that “what people want” can converge on—depending on choice architecture and conditions.
1 reply 0 retweets 22 likes -
No. There are short term and long term feedback cycles. They can control the short term ones. But the long term ones lead to Snap
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @benedictevans @zeynep and
Essentially you’re arguing FB could make whatever product it wants, sprinkle sugar and get use. This is partly true but only in short term
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @benedictevans @zeynep and
In fact, the whole history of FB is radical product changes as it tries to follow users. It has almost never been able to lead them.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @benedictevans @zeynep and
The only place FB has, rightly, thought it knew user wants better than users was in sharing. Everywhere else it follows. Just like google.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @benedictevans @zeynep and
Did you read my post? I’d be interested in your thoughts on it.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
I have! Was partially responding to it.—Hard in this UI. I think of "what people want" as sinkholes or strange attractors. They're a force.
1 reply 0 retweets 19 likes -
Replying to @zeynep @benedictevans and
But they don't exist as singular equilibrium points. There is more than one place they could go—and where that goes depends a lot on paths.
4 replies 0 retweets 18 likes -
For google that certainly isn’t true. For FB the only other equilibrium point apparent is Snap. And my post argues it might not be one
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
May be true with "advertise to users by selling targeted space in feed" model; not necessarily true. And FB profitable enough to experiment.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.