Sure, except I first wrote about it using Obama campaign targeting as a cautionary tale. But carry on. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯https://twitter.com/fabiochiusi/status/917356703062118400 …
-
-
Show this thread
-
Here, a paper published in world's most prestigious scientific journal by Facebook's own researchers. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯https://twitter.com/makworx/status/917373326552596480 …
Show this thread -
Also, Facebook is hardly arguing that its platform has no influence, and that it is a half a trillion $ con. More:https://twitter.com/zeynep/status/908050512641007616 …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Hahahahahaha
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Here's my question for you,
@zeynep: have you seen any evidence that "that these new methods are more effective in manipulating people"? -
Influence panics are as old as advertising, but decades of research has shown negligible effectiveness. Hence the "minimal effects" school.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This is key. Too bad we didn't have this given the campaign interference we now havepic.twitter.com/oDwBDgT2zs
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.