That’s a total red herring. If this needs more people, it’s a matter of 100 people.
-
-
Replying to @benedictevans @JPWP
take that at face value, and what the heck does that mean they don't even hire hundred people?
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
I think it should at least be hundreds of thousands of people, why not? US is not the only country, and every country needs local expertise.
2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
You’ve locked on a pleasing rherotical point that isn’t meaningful. This has nothing to do with the size of FB’s overall workforce.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
And hiring ‘hundreds of thousands’ of poeple is the same as saying you wish Facebook would disappear. It’s utterly impossible.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
You might as well demand that Google hire millions of people to check search results. It’s not a rational statement.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
She's saying there's a way to have these institutions not promote fascism. That is possible. Question: how? You are denying the question.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
No. I am saying that one should not treat a bug as evidence of moral failure, not that the system with the bug should be shut down.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
It's called negligence and it is absolutely immoral. Hey whatever he was drunk, he didn't mean to get behind the wheel and run over a kid.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
That’s 1 assertion and 1 random analogy with no connection to the point. Are you proposing software should not have bugs? That’s easy to say
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
A business model & workforce approach are not bugs. (Even w/ bugs: if you OS has proper sandboxing, or you protect against SQL injection..)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.