No, humans for oversight plus extensive effort to anticipate these issues and quickly intervene. They always react only after PR crisis. +
-
-
That’s a total red herring. If this needs more people, it’s a matter of 100 people.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @benedictevans @JPWP
take that at face value, and what the heck does that mean they don't even hire hundred people?
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
I think it should at least be hundreds of thousands of people, why not? US is not the only country, and every country needs local expertise.
2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
You’ve locked on a pleasing rherotical point that isn’t meaningful. This has nothing to do with the size of FB’s overall workforce.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
And hiring ‘hundreds of thousands’ of poeple is the same as saying you wish Facebook would disappear. It’s utterly impossible.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
You might as well demand that Google hire millions of people to check search results. It’s not a rational statement.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @benedictevans @JPWP
Their job wouldn't be to replicate automation. You can't be in the people business—which they are—with that little attention to ppl issues.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
‘Attention to people issues’ does not mean ‘hire hundreds of thousands of people’
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @benedictevans @JPWP
Global userbase. Needs country by country expertise. Subcultures. People who play red team, socially and politically.
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes
So far, the big PR crises have all been stuff that large number of people have been jumping up-and-down about. And ignored.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.