With ML, we have classifiers/categorizers *in the hands of power* that work well enough to suss out what you did NOT disclose. Big big deal.
-
-
This is a minor paper; narrow, conditional results. But it's the direction & this will be done with nation-state data—not by grad students.
Show this thread -
Back to this. Worry not about chess or conscious toasters. Threat is AI at the hands of power: gov'ts, corporations.https://twitter.com/zeynep/status/904707522958852097 …
Show this thread -
No, your gait could identify you. A database of clothes purchases. Height. Retina. Not now, but all this is possiblehttps://twitter.com/CassidyGavin/status/904782974285209600 …
Show this thread -
People who hope "OPSEC" will work for a growing movement=ppl who've never been in a growing movement facing a state. https://twitter.com/ncweaver/status/904784480224763904 …
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread -
Tech world should learn from nurses and librarians. They define *and* take their ethical responsibilities seriously. https://twitter.com/greene_dm/status/903592320544763904 …
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Not sure how such AI can be restricted in practice, if power want to use it. So, fight fire with fire? Use tech for active countermeasures?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Needless AI Panic. Why use the words authoritarianism and nation-states? Call it the FBI. "Will the FBI use this?" is more interesting
-
Did the FBI abuse gait-detection during Occupy? Did the FBI's protest-disruption techniques work?
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
If you are in AI/tech, you have to pick a historical side.