Historically, nation-states have LONG figured out how to turn anonymity against protesters—informants, misinformation etc. Clear record but+
-
-
There is a reason many movements that face deep state violence go public and away from anonymity—anonymity plays to gov't strengths. BUT +
Show this thread -
For a dissent *ecology* to exist, people need a basic right to privacy, dignity and autonomy. AI in the hands of power threatens all that.
Show this thread -
This is a minor paper; narrow, conditional results. But it's the direction & this will be done with nation-state data—not by grad students.
Show this thread -
Back to this. Worry not about chess or conscious toasters. Threat is AI at the hands of power: gov'ts, corporations.https://twitter.com/zeynep/status/904707522958852097 …
Show this thread -
No, your gait could identify you. A database of clothes purchases. Height. Retina. Not now, but all this is possiblehttps://twitter.com/CassidyGavin/status/904782974285209600 …
Show this thread -
People who hope "OPSEC" will work for a growing movement=ppl who've never been in a growing movement facing a state. https://twitter.com/ncweaver/status/904784480224763904 …
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread -
Tech world should learn from nurses and librarians. They define *and* take their ethical responsibilities seriously. https://twitter.com/greene_dm/status/903592320544763904 …
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
If you are in AI/tech, you have to pick a historical side.