Look, tech problem isn't just discrimination against women+minorities. It's hostility to ESSENTIAL skills that/because many engineers lack.
-
-
Here's a thing I had written about this way back in 2012. This is a pervasive reason for why tech is where it is. https://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2011/06/15/computer-sciences-sputnik-moment/change-the-cowboy-culture-in-computer-science …pic.twitter.com/AJY04BBlSi
-
You realize that this is exactly what he called for in the manifesto, right?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
it's not PR driven. as an employer you cannot let someone like that stay in workforce after making a hostile work env.
-
corps are required by law to not commit or enable discrimination, and that screed posted on company servers / time cannot be allowed
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I agree the firing is probably PR (and legal) driven, but that doesn't make him a scapegoat. What matters is what Google does next.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The few women, women who are minorities and minorities working there, or other decent folk might have had a issue working with him after tho
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I agree with you. You may find this insightful.pic.twitter.com/Ziq1qUNU6h
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Issuing formal manifestos and disseminating them to the company is a "widespread problem"? News to me. This is behavior, not just ideas.
-
Firing was the easy way out for Google, which has systemic problems it is afraid to confront publicly.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
All Google engineer's job responsibilities included providing peer feedback and helping in the hiring process. He disqualified himself.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
