Been on the cards for ages. Digital Science (same parent company as Springer Nature) are doing the same. Full workflow & data capture.
-
-
-
Indeed. Our university already uses a DS product for RDM and back end for our institutional repository, staff profiles, etc.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Elsevier (and others but especially Elsevier) makes wild profits by restricting access to knowledge mostly paid for by the public.
-
All their purchase spree is more of the same: locking-in access, to be sold back to academics who produced the knowledge in the first place.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I'm not sure it's "smothering" that Elsevier is doing here but rather bringing OA into the workflow that they provide/control
-
OA is inevitable. Who owns/controls it may quickly be becoming inevitable as well.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Sci-hub is only a temporary workaround at best. If you want to win against Elsevier, peer review must work without publishers...
-
...and research institutions themselves must own their repositories. Nothing less will weaken publishers' power in the long term.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.