NYT is moving to using machine learning to moderate its (actually, pretty great) comment section. Big shift. Will they study it thoroughly?https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/874592901073956864 …
-
-
We need to study this in many more ways; but the speed & logic that it's happening under isn't suited to that kind of research & reflection.
-
Continuing, serious q: What would doing that research and reflection well look like? Are there guidelines?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
work-to-rule would be the equivalent of a rule-based 'expert system' ... machine learning is not that, it'll be seemingly arbritary at times
-
We'll get work-to-rule and seemingly arbitrary deviations, so the worst of both worlds.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.