Are people supposed to let hundreds of people just constantly ping them, while they have no right to direct their attention as they wish?
-
-
Replying to @zeynep @NAChristakis
Blocking someone does not limit their right to speak, just limits their ability to occupy *your* attention at that moment. Day is limited.
2 replies 3 retweets 14 likes -
Replying to @zeynep
But but then why not mute? Why block strangers you've never interacted with, in advance, allowing others to decide for you who can hear you?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @NAChristakis
Two reasons. Block is a social signal. Raising the bar/friction for them to ping you. They can always log out and see you.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @zeynep @NAChristakis
Second, they are often siccing their followers on you, to harass you. Adds friction to that process. Though I do wish we had better tools.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @zeynep
Ok but why block in *advance* based on someone *else's* list. Preventing others form hearing what *you* are saying. It feels mob-like to me.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @NAChristakis
You are missing the fact that the *mob* is attacking individuals to shut them off and chase them off. They are defending themselves.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @zeynep @NAChristakis
I wish they had better tools to defend themselves but this is what we got at the moment.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @zeynep
I'm learning from you but am surprised at many elements of this culture. I also get the "decentralized collective sanction" idea (of course)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @NAChristakis
Yep. Tools for protecting freedom of assembly & control over attention is key, imo, to protecting freedom of speech, too. Platforms shrug.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Later! Good, thorny, important topic.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.