With each major cultural/political shift, we see theories of new kind of people. Not really. Players: same. Game: newish. Gameboard: newest.
-
-
-
Well put
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I found your point about the differences between the "hoaxes" very salient, too. (More interest to academic side of it).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yep. The quantification of output craze is actually a huge deal in third-world(ish) countries; fake journals aim at that market mostly, imo.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Infrastructure is indeed key. But, not just news media. Eg. changing parties: ideological coherence, nomination reforms. Also ...
-
baseline things like Sen rules vulnerable to partisan obstruction. All these things interact. I think Berger & Luckmann very helpful ...
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thinking about this as an infrastructure problem could be a useful paradigm, but I am always suspicious of claims of immutable human nature.
-
In all my years of studying anthropology and social sciences in general, I've found adaptability to be the most universal of human traits.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Also great thread here: https://twitter.com/svateboje/status/867414958950289409 … I know the topic feels urgent; and it is, but there is so much academics can bring to this.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yep. Agree. The way both sociology and political science have outsourced media analysis is kind of puzzling. Needs org/econ analysis.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.