This is a vanity press "journal." Scam journals exist. Peer review can fail, but this is an example of scam—self-described "high quality".https://twitter.com/sapinker/status/865750088794214400 …
-
-
I think the people claiming this hoax worked are the ones who got hoaxed due to lack of research. https://twitter.com/gavinmuellerphd/status/865915706747092998 …
This Tweet is unavailable. -
The "authors" are quite explicit in reference to the predatory nature of the journal http://www.skeptic.com/reading_room/conceptual-penis-social-contruct-sokal-style-hoax-on-gender-studies/ …
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.