This is a vanity press "journal." Scam journals exist. Peer review can fail, but this is an example of scam—self-described "high quality".https://twitter.com/sapinker/status/865750088794214400 …
-
-
Also this. Good reasons why humanities publishing—on the human condition—isn't exactly like epidemiology publishing.https://twitter.com/zittrain/status/865923368217915392 …
-
I think the people claiming this hoax worked are the ones who got hoaxed due to lack of research. https://twitter.com/gavinmuellerphd/status/865915706747092998 …
This Tweet is unavailable. - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.