And Microsoft's EXTRA cash hoard of $100 billion isn't irrelevant. It's partly there because we let software be sold "as is", no liability.
-
-
Not sympathetic toward extending xp forever, but this is dead on. We need an infrastructure OS with that longevity in mind. XP wasn't.
-
yeah. not forever but a transition has to be considered and supported.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
People claim that it's stupid to argue software safety consider every other historical example. Vint Cerf makes same point, too. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
MS sold XP for embedded systems. The OS lifetime has to match the lifetime of the targeted system. No excuses.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What do you suppose makes disagreement on infosec topics possess such fervor? I'm surprised at intensity of pushback.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Premises can be wrong.
- Show replies
-
-
-
Ever check into an IHG/Hilton branded hotel? Their PMS is easily from early 00, if not earlier. Walmart's SMART system? circa 1990s
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.