Let me ask: whose responsibility is it to structure things so that autonomous cars don't have ransomware? "$100K or we go down the cliff?"
-
-
Why does a 10 million dollar embedded device have SMB turned on? Whoever procured that is responsible, not MS...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We did. It's called Linux. It's open source and you have to upgrade. You also have to maintain your software to work on it.
-
Linux is not safer; it also ages out quicker. Open source has benefits but not the answer to this problem unless funded like MS.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
And people giving me examples from car safety! That example works in favor of MY argument. Read a little history! https://www.amazon.com/Car-Safety-Wars-Technology-Politics/dp/1611477476 …pic.twitter.com/whZ1sWjB2E
-
Arguing it's not Microsoft's problem to maintain XP security is not the same but on the same side of history as arguing against seat belts.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
part of the problem is, MS got into the embedded game without considering long term supportability. US govt won't act, poss EU will?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This advice for today
#WannaCry#ransomware If you can't patch, disable SMBv1 - Microsoft support: http://bit.ly/2qCtNVd -
Of course ... patch and backup, too.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
As a normal human, I don't want to pay for the kind of reliability some guy running a dam for a century needs.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You are hitting the nail on the head, which is that that software stack was not built for that kind of infrastructure. Windows was a kludge.
-
Gates himself has come right out and said it. It's an inherently insecure system.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.