Open source has benefits, but it's not necessarily more secure. Even if open source, no cheap way to security. https://twitter.com/Thurguston1/status/863553253560037376 …
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
no matter what of you have a computer network you run you need sys admins with resources and training
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Pls reconsider using "cripple." It reinforces negative perceptions of disability.http://thetalon.ca/social-justice-synonyms-18-crippled-and-paralyzed/ …
-
just, no. Attitudes are the problem, not vocabulary.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Respectfully, I disagree. There aren't many analogues to software, but feels like lifetime warranty and would set dangerous precedent.
-
Demanding a company always maintain software paid for once is untenable and explains why subscription models are becoming the norm.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Does the New York Times send everyone a free reprint when they correct an article? No? Then why should Microsoft?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not a lot of evidence that OSS fulfills its potential to be more secure. Opposite seems to be the case, more often than not.
-
Open Source could be more disastrous if it's not patched/updated on time.pic.twitter.com/eKbcZH5sOi
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Did
@darienhuss register domain and activate “kill switch”? I thought it was@MalwareTechBlog@nytopinion@nytimespic.twitter.com/xsbHFWsuLM
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.