Almost - I would say "...how you stop their business interests from influencing..."
-
-
Replying to @AlecMuffett @_Cymatics_
Again, this can all be figured out; and if not, don't launch the product. Not everything has to be unleashed with no brakes.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @zeynep @_Cymatics_
So you're in favour of censorship and centralised control over content, so long as it's balanced, right, fair and just?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AlecMuffett @_Cymatics_
There's already censorship & central control over content. I would disband some forms of it. But hell yeah, I'd block live stream of murder.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @zeynep @_Cymatics_
So would I, but I wouldn't block creation or deployment of 1.8bn people's ability to livecast, in order to hamper a handful of sick people.
2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
And I speak as the fmr architect for FB Messenger E2E, who was told "But Terrorists Will Use This!", yet we launched it for the greater good
2 replies 3 retweets 3 likes -
-
Encryption protects fundamental rights; terrorists can already use it and it is rarely the reason they can't catch people. There, an excuse.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This will directly inspire copycat murder and suicide and on camera abuse. More like a car without breaks. People like to drive isn't enough
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @zeynep @AlecMuffett
Hold on... what are Google and Twitter doing that FB isn't doing? Sorry if that's an ignorant question... but they have live vid too.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
FB is different for many reasons.
-
-
Replying to @zeynep @_Cymatics_
Because FB is successful at deploying livestreaming globally, compared to Twitter/Google?
0 replies 1 retweet 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.