IE only exists even in weakened form because of Windows—effectively still monopolistic. Also MS office. Still dominates despite inferiority.
Here's disagreement/agreement. I think you are right for the future. I argue MS still holding on—for decades!—because of monopoly/legacy.
-
-
No, the disagreement is whether Microsoft's monopoly was ended by state action. I'd argue that it was ended by the market changing.
-
Our point is that it's taking decades and decades to unravel—with stagnant company still printing money—and might not have without action.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.