IE only exists even in weakened form because of Windows—effectively still monopolistic. Also MS office. Still dominates despite inferiority.
-
-
Replying to @zeynep @benedictevans
And it only was weakened because there was a massive case in the US (as well as action in Europe) on tying the browser to the OS.
1 reply 0 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @matthewstoller @zeynep
That has nothing to do with the collapse of Windows share. And Chrome came a very long time after those cases.
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
The deeper point you're missing - Microsoft's monopoly evaporated because the market changed. Anti-trust was entirely peripheral
3 replies 1 retweet 10 likes -
And the monopoly DID evaporate. It's gone.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @benedictevans @matthewstoller
I'm just not seeing how its monopoly is gone especially in institutions. (Do you mean smartphones? Yes; it never transitioned there).
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @zeynep @matthewstoller
Last year 250 Windows PCs and 1.5bn smartphones were sold. Microsoft's dominance is gone.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @benedictevans @matthewstoller
What percentage of software/OS spending at the enterprise/institution level (where the money is) would you say goes to MS Win/office?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @zeynep @matthewstoller
Microsoft has not been a leader in enterprise software for a very very long time.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Google, Apple, Facebook=very innovative companies; pushing boundaries, expanding. MS=coasting, making $$$$ on legacy/monopoly. We agree! 
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Different new set of issues, for sure. What's clear is there are strong dynamics in software towards centralization & monopolistic forces.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.