Question: what level of evidence (there in their reporting!) is needed to make reporters/pundits give up their false archetypes/stereotypes?https://twitter.com/davidfolkenflik/status/845637801186131972 …
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
They won't. They say HRC is a "weak" candidate. But she is the only female candidate ever to be taken seriously. Ever.
& she won 3 million votes in popular despite irregular intervention by Russia & the FBI that's strong. Not invulnerable but strong.
Piece explains—at length & nicely—that the bill was unworkable policy and it was sold very badly. So who puts in the opposite false cliche?
Someone who is not great at transition sentences? Who also is working in a rush? It looks like an editor fail.
Once you internalize the “it’s like they don’t read their own reporting” you start to see it everywhere. Strange cognitive blindness
A lot of that may be due to the rush to gin up and push content; good conclusions take thought, rushing invites cliche
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.