if ur advocationg YouTube recommend videos that counter *every* video that's fine, but theres some heretofore criteria of which ones
-
-
Replying to @adamjohnsonNYC
I am, in fact, recommending considering the criteria by which the whole "engagement via rabbit holing" model works.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @zeynep
right. And as a subset of that recommendation you're advocating editorial calls on *specific* videos. I'm asking which and why.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @adamjohnsonNYC @zeynep
like w/ fake news you rush to pressure media corporations into making determinations of truth w/o bother to define how exactly.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @adamjohnsonNYC
You're fine with recommendation algorithms editorial decisions as set by few powerful corporations & we should jut shut up?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @zeynep
uh, what? Who do you think will be making these determinations of truth? It's going to be large corporations.
1 reply 0 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @adamjohnsonNYC
And we should just shut up about their editorial choices which already exist? I'm not fine being so subservient.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @zeynep
you're advocating explicitly empowering corporations to make determinations of truth under the auspices of opposing them.
2 replies 1 retweet 13 likes -
Replying to @adamjohnsonNYC
No they're already making choices. I refuse to shut up about what they are and accept "status quo" because they're powerful.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @zeynep
this is total sophistry. Editorial "choices" based on crowd sourcing isn't the same as independent determinations of fact by humans
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes
Recommender algos aren't crowdsourcing" in some straightforward way—though the powerful would like you to be that gullible.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.