it's not recommendeding those videos because it's evil, it's doing so because others who watched also watched those+other criteria
-
-
Replying to @adamjohnsonNYC @zeynep
you use these extreme examples that are effectively using the word in the definition. I'm asking for criteria not examples.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @adamjohnsonNYC @zeynep
if ur advocationg YouTube recommend videos that counter *every* video that's fine, but theres some heretofore criteria of which ones
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @adamjohnsonNYC
I am, in fact, recommending considering the criteria by which the whole "engagement via rabbit holing" model works.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @zeynep
right. And as a subset of that recommendation you're advocating editorial calls on *specific* videos. I'm asking which and why.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @adamjohnsonNYC @zeynep
like w/ fake news you rush to pressure media corporations into making determinations of truth w/o bother to define how exactly.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @adamjohnsonNYC
You're fine with recommendation algorithms editorial decisions as set by few powerful corporations & we should jut shut up?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @zeynep
uh, what? Who do you think will be making these determinations of truth? It's going to be large corporations.
1 reply 0 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @adamjohnsonNYC
And we should just shut up about their editorial choices which already exist? I'm not fine being so subservient.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Many ways to program them; what to optimize for; choice of training data. Humans run the thing. I refuse to shrug.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.