If it's not on the @WhatsApp site, billions of users won't know about it. I find it grossly negligent.
-
-
Replying to @AaronToponce2 replies 1 retweet 1 like
-
Replying to @zeynep
If there was a rebuttal front-and-center on the
@WhatsApp site, the women marches may not have advocated against its use.pic.twitter.com/tVF3t2ZDVA
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AaronToponce
I hear what you are saying; and it's tricky. Rebuttals also gather a lot of attention, confuse people. Bad situation.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @zeynep @AaronToponce
I do wish their help pages provided better explainers; regardless of Guardian brouhaha. The help pages are really lacking.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @zeynep
And yet it still can be MITM by
@whatsapp, thanks to the web portal at https://web.whatsapp.com . It's hard to trust them.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AaronToponce
I disagree; but I also encourage people to not use browsers--diff game. We are talking about phones which is what most do.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @zeynep
I'm not changing the topic of debate. But 1) no official statement, 2) web portal backdoor, and 3) poorly worded FAQ are concerning.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AaronToponce @zeynep
That's where I am concerned about their trustworthiness. It seems they just don't care.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AaronToponce
That's not my read. Responding aggressively also has risks--more confusing publicity. I think they care but no good options+
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
...after Guardian's irresponsible move. I have TONS of criticisms of them, always had, but this was a tough pickle.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.