Now you're not? What's the criteria? I repeat mine: expose wrongdoing of sufficient gravity that public has right to know. /end
-
-
Replying to @zeynep
How can I say this more clearly? I have repeatedly defended these leaks. https://twitter.com/CNN/status/833356193590571008 … - issue is non-leak subversionpic.twitter.com/D9E8GjYIBR
2 replies 2 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @ggreenwald
So you responded to a thread I started objecting to a New York Times article, discussing the deep state with Turkish flags. /n
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @zeynep @ggreenwald
But an opportunity to delineate overlap and difference, so here goes. /n
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @zeynep @ggreenwald
Democratic establishment is incompetent and overly focuses on the wrong things: Big club, but not the best analytic approach.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @zeynep @ggreenwald
The people who paved the way for weakening institutional & other checks because they like the weakener, were very wrong. Yes. /n
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @zeynep @ggreenwald
Not all leaks or acts defying instructions institutional hierarchies are good. But some are. Context and ethics dependent. /n
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @zeynep @ggreenwald
so here's the key question, in liberal democracies, what do electoral majorities or pluralities get to do and not get to do?
1 reply 2 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @zeynep @ggreenwald
In no functioning democracy, an electoral does or should allow unfettered power. Seems obvious. Question is how?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @zeynep
Right. The founders designed checks against such populist abuses - like courts, media, protests. Rogue CIA wasn't one of them.
3 replies 7 retweets 11 likes
I'd never defend "rogue CIA" but you need more if Snowden is not "rogue NSA" For me: exposes wrongdoing public should know?
-
-
Replying to @zeynep
How is this not a rogue IC?https://www.wsj.com/articles/spies-keep-intelligence-from-donald-trump-1487209351 …
1 reply 5 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @ggreenwald
That one is hard because it rests on a hypothetical that is truly difficult to imagine but under consideration: compromised NSC.
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.