Every coalition building requires uneasy choices. But not at the expense of vulnerable groups. That's not pandering, that's immoral.
-
-
Replying to @zeynep
So, the question is what are moral policies & choices that also have the potentially to expand the coalition? There are many, in fact.
4 replies 5 retweets 13 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @kate_dc
A reasonable discussion. My sense is inclusive economy and social safety net WITHOUT giving an inch on anti-racism & anti-bigotry.
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @kate_dc
For example. Everyone keeps arguing as if there has to be pandering to bigotry. No, that is never okay. But not only path.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
The counter-argument is that so many are wedded to bigotry, hence unshakable. Maybe. But no such thing is 100% complete & solid.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @kate_dc
Yes, but the issue is the current polarization and firm support with the GOP base. Not an easy political moment.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
This is why it's important to focus, maybe first, on incompetence of opposition party. He's got a Goldman Sachs cabinet.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.