> @zeynep and of course Sam; my belief is that the "exclusive" was @manisha_bot ?
@SamuelGibbs https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/jan/13/whatsapp-encryption-backdoor-snooping-signal …
/@nathanielmott
-
-
Replying to @AlecMuffett
Alec Muffett Retweeted
>
@zeynep This brings up to four the number of Guardian articles on Friday https://twitter.com/GdnLaw/status/819977205065216000 …@manisha_bot@SamuelGibbs@nathanielmottAlec Muffett added,
This Tweet is unavailable.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @AlecMuffett @SamuelGibbs and
ugh, what a piece of mal-informed actively-harmful garbage.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Dymaxion @AlecMuffett and
Been watching for days as people got totally confused, gave up on security.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @zeynep @AlecMuffett and
Not surprised. Couldn't have designed a better set of articles to break trust.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Dymaxion @AlecMuffett and
I actually am very sympathetic to the "not technology alone for privacy" view.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
I find Facebook's metadata grab of WhatsApp horrible. I rail against it a lot.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I agree internet's ad-business model is a disaster for privacy. Written so much on that.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
I still wouldn't falsely write "WhatsApp has a backdoor confuse confuse please click".

2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
The editorial does not say "whatsapp has a backdoor".
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
My problem isn't the editorial. I don't totally agree w/ it, it has good points.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.