why? you'd recognize the voice. what's the scenario?
-
-
Replying to @zeynep
The attacker would carry out the attack on both ends and forward the sound while listening. Sure you understand this material?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tobiasboelter
You get a post hoc message. You're talking. Ask about phone change. The MitM scenarios don't make sense given alternatives.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @zeynep
You don't see the post hoc message until after the call is over!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tobiasboelter
Phone call wont be buffered like message. But let's assume. Also, right, aka post hoc. Still not a threat worth cutting+
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @zeynep @tobiasboelter
off reliability which will make ppl switch to less secure apps. They won't go to signal Which fails frequently & small base.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @zeynep
Not true! WhatsApp even leaves people with the enhanced security enable vulnerable. At least those ppl should be protected.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tobiasboelter
I think the scope conditions are not worth the trage off in dropped messages. I'd want more options & better documentation.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @zeynep
Btw. wouldn't be any dropped messages. Senders would get a notification asking to resend the message. And only very very rarely.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tobiasboelter
It's a reasonable choice to send the message; risk surface tiny. Option would be nice, sure.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
If I had a whatsapp threat, it's the metadata sharing. I find that horrible. This, a reasonable choice given user base.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.