You are entitled to your opinion, obviously. I'd want you to disagree with my actual position.
-
-
We actually don't have a minor disagreement; it's not nuance either. It's just not captured in your piece.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I decided I'll just go ahead with my own plan and write my longer piece. I can't fix everyone's poor practices.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Lesson to me to respond to people like you in mistaken good faith, assuming you'd ping me if you wanted quote.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Rather than quote in tiny chunks *after* I explicitly told you I wasn't able to make my point tweet at a time.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @zeynep @JNaureckas
you told me you couldn't make an overarching definition, not as it relates to one specific point.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @adamjohnsonNYC @JNaureckas
No, I explicitly told you that I wasn't able to express the disagreement in 140 and that I was writing longer.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @zeynep @JNaureckas
yes... on a broader point, not the one i asked about.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @adamjohnsonNYC @JNaureckas
You do you. My lesson: don't talk on Twitter in good faith.Don't expect an email after saying I can't do in 140.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @zeynep @JNaureckas
you said that about your broader definition, not my point blank question no matter how much you continue to grandstand
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
I don't understand why you are so resistant to obvious point: email if they explicitly say Twitter not enough.
-
-
Again, I give up. I have learned my lesson. I can only warn others.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.