why people number their thread tweets if they worry about this, obvious that single tweet is part of a bigger thought
-
-
Replying to @nathanjurgenson @plragde
Yes. Last issue was I explicitly said "sorry, can't do definition in 140; longer later" got deliberately ignored.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
So no defense against such bad faith... Would happen with blogs too. I tend to engage people so disappointing..
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
but there is a different norm and expectation on twitter, justifiable or not
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
"it's bad but expected" is kinda twitters whole motto :(
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nathanjurgenson @plragde
I've had fairly good experiences; journalists often email me if they want quote; do I can respond explicitly.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @zeynep
tabloid-y outlets gets a lot of mileage from breaking context like that, but if you're not just trying to make fun, good to email
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nathanjurgenson @zeynep
remembering Gawkers "public is public" treatise (think: anti context integrity) that lots of folks on deadline adhere to
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nathanjurgenson
In this case it was someone blogging for a media watchdog I actually care about worked with for decades.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @zeynep
would love if twitter built a tool that blurred threading and blogging together. maybe would compete too much with medium?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Or something that allows attaching a link to all tweets so that if they are embedded or quote-tweeted, link to some text.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.