I wrote about the botched Washington Post Vermont scare and the ever slippery definition of "Fake news"http://fair.org/home/wapo-spreading-own-falsehoods-shows-real-power-of-fake-news/ …
-
-
I linked to the thread in a public forum. It was a public debate, how does this require a separate comment?
-
A tweet in a long long thread does not represent my views, which you did not understand. There is EMAIL.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
.
@adamjohnsonNYC Why am I learning about being quoted wildly out of context from 140 char chunks and bady paraphrased from a Google alert? -
twitter is a public forum. It wasn't at all out of context, and I *linked* to the context for all to read
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
don't bother. He's just interested in smearing ppl.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
you also didn't "double down." Stories like these reminds me why people are always wary of talking to journalists.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
you're on a PUBLIC WEBSITE. Anything you type outside of Direct Messages is free for anyone to use.
-
That's not the point.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Two reactions: 1) being misquoted sucks, I empathize 2) Perhaps an expected hazard of communication by tweetstorm?
-
He could have emailed me. Told me (or tweeted at me) that he wanted to quote me. Easy peasy. Anyway.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.