lol no it's not. That Obama has "done nothing to stop" Russia & Syria is objectively false. CIA has armed and funded the opposition.
-
-
Replying to @adamjohnsonNYC
I disagree with McCain on substance but... It's legit political opinion to say that in reference to Aleppo.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @zeynep @adamjohnsonNYC
I oppose lumping such (real) disagreements on what "doing something" means as mere "fake news"..
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @zeynep
what McCain said objectively false. The US has not "done nothing" in Syria. This isn't debatable.
2 replies 1 retweet 10 likes -
Replying to @adamjohnsonNYC @zeynep
using your logic RT could say Russia had "done nothing" to sway US election because it didn't directly hack voting machines.
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @adamjohnsonNYC
You could write an opinion piece saying RU interference didn't have an impact because votes counted correctly, it would be+
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @zeynep
no not impact, if they said "Russia did nothing" this would be false. As is McCains statement.
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @adamjohnsonNYC
I disagree with most of his reasoning *and* your interpretation of it as fake news. Sorry, just don't see that as fake news.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @zeynep
All respect 2
@zeynep but wht abt@adamjohnsonNYC's point isnt clear? Avg reader interprets McCain 2 mean BO did literally nothing re Syria2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
harm of fake news is ppl see demonstrbly false claim nd think its true. Tht descriptor applies 2 this WaPo editorial
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Harms may and do overlap for sure.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.