Haha, but the current model of burying head in sand isn't working out much better, wouldn't you say?
-
-
it's obviously imperfect. If we were going to have a normal policy debate, there are things to consider...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dandrezner @zeynep and
but the odds of this being a clusterf**k rather than a normal policy debate are pretty damn high.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @dandrezner @zeynep and
and the foreign policy implications of all of the incoming trade policies are... um... not good.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Way to oppose counterproductive stuff, or crude protectionism or crazy mercantilism is .. alternatives.
1 reply 2 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @zeynep @dandrezner and
Let's stop treating trade, automation & markets as external forces & representations of ideal type.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
fine, but I refuse to relinquish my skepticism that government actions targeted at trade will work well.
4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Ha-Joon Chang's treatment on S. Korean industrial policy is a pretty good counter to this.
6 replies 2 retweets 8 likes -
I share Dans skepticism, but skepticism <> you don't try something, esp given what's going on worldwide.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
More people might be into Pluto colonization "moonshot" than discussing, hey this isn't the only model.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
One doesn't have to be against trade or automation to consider different mechanisms of doing it.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.