Key actor in this saga: People saw 70-90% Clinton win probability; didn't understand that 1-2% polling error would move that by 30-40%.
-
-
Replying to @zeynep
: Except when we literally wrote that for like 10 days straight and the whole Internet got mad at us:http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/trump-is-just-a-normal-polling-error-behind-clinton/ …
8 replies 28 retweets 170 likes -
Replying to @NateSilver538
Yep, people don't listen, don't understand. You have to poke them in the eye with it—preferably at the only place they look.
3 replies 2 retweets 28 likes
Replying to @zeynep @NateSilver538
I wish you had visually integrated the piece above to top of model page—opposite of NYT putting "90% win!!!" on every piece.
9:18 PM - 9 Dec 2016
0 replies
2 retweets
20 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.