sure, I get your point. But not at the cost of hungry children, many of whom get best meal of the day at school.
-
-
Replying to @LibyaLiberty @annia
Of course not. But left (especially Silicon Valley) version of this debate is short-sighted. People *do* focus on jobs.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Most left has little policy on jobs beyond "job training" for jobs that don't exist or "UBI" (assumes bohemian artist?)
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Or lots of people saying "but trade is beneficial" (it is but...) or "it's tech/automation" and... ?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I'm not at all against feeding all the kids (we should!) but there is a point there that resonates—regardless of Ryan.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
lol I know ur not & understand the point. But he can introduce need for sustainable solutions w/o attacking free lunch effort
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @LibyaLiberty
I'm not really discussing Ryan; just the difference in framing is real, and I believe lots of people are missing that frame.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @zeynep
sure, You're right. If you stop at that initial quote u will feel satisfying outrage but it's not an accurate portrayal of his point
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LibyaLiberty @zeynep
and I can even agree w him that improving wages is better than gov't handouts - but everyone can agree w that. His priorities stink
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LibyaLiberty @zeynep
I always appreciate your objective analysis of the facts at hand.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
thanks. Not objective as much as what is this frame, and why/if does it resonate. Sometimes try to do in spite of person. :-D
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.