A month ago, people were getting so mad about articles like these: http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/trump-is-just-a-normal-polling-error-behind-clinton/ … http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/election-update-dont-ignore-the-polls-clinton-leads-but-its-a-close-race/ …http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/election-update-why-clintons-position-is-worse-than-obamas/ …
-
-
Replying to @mttyspn @NateSilver538
Because people don't understand what the model is doing, and what the source of volatility is.
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @zeynep @NateSilver538
At this point, I'm quite skeptical that any constantly updated model—starting a year out—serves democracy well.+
4 replies 1 retweet 12 likes -
Replying to @zeynep @NateSilver538
Updates much less often; better visual communication of uncertainty; what correlated errors mean; start later...
2 replies 1 retweet 8 likes
Replying to @zeynep @NateSilver538
But those go against the underlying business model; why I think modeling is great but not as lead-clickgetter.
7:05 AM - 5 Dec 2016
0 replies
0 retweets
3 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.