I literally said above I don't think it's "Why Trump won". I don't think anything I did in my coverage
-
-
missed it. Thanks.
2 replies 1 retweet 6 likes -
Replying to @maggieNYT @chrislhayes and
Not nearly enough pre-election coverage of business ties & real & potential conflicts.
27 replies 77 retweets 233 likes -
Replying to @DavidCornDC @chrislhayes and
and you think that's why he won? That's where this thread began.
12 replies 5 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @maggieNYT @DavidCornDC and
No, issue is what drove media coverage, in scale, scope and content, pre-election.
3 replies 5 retweets 14 likes -
Replying to @zeynep @maggieNYT and
FWIW, I think social media made mass media less important; elite failure; too much+
1 reply 3 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @zeynep @maggieNYT and
focus on data journalism without reading its footnotes (which were ay, ay ay) and+
1 reply 3 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @zeynep @maggieNYT and
zeynep tufekci Retweeted zeynep tufekci
and Clinton campaign. I thought convention risked loss, tbh.https://twitter.com/zeynep/status/758466685435125761 …
zeynep tufekci added,
1 reply 3 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @zeynep @DavidCornDC and
Clinton was running, more or less, from mid-2014 on. Doing paid speeches + the stilted
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @maggieNYT @zeynep and
book tour at moment of populist upsets in NYC elsewhere were mistakes.
2 replies 2 retweets 0 likes
I can do longer list of Clinton issues. Not relevant to journalism's responsibilities.
-
-
Replying to @zeynep @maggieNYT and
In big picture, it seems your beef is with voters (and, perhaps cable media).
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.