be willing to say the same. And I think it's clear that Trump's business conflicts did not receive sufficient attn
-
-
That doesn't even seem controversial to me. It's not nefarious, but it was a collective error.
7 replies 19 retweets 148 likes -
it also doesn't mean it's why Trump won. You don't think voters had a lot of info by Election Day?
20 replies 3 retweets 15 likes -
I literally said above I don't think it's "Why Trump won". I don't think anything I did in my coverage
13 replies 4 retweets 33 likes -
missed it. Thanks.
2 replies 1 retweet 6 likes -
Replying to @maggieNYT @chrislhayes and
Not nearly enough pre-election coverage of business ties & real & potential conflicts.
27 replies 77 retweets 233 likes -
Replying to @DavidCornDC @chrislhayes and
and you think that's why he won? That's where this thread began.
12 replies 5 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @maggieNYT @DavidCornDC and
No, issue is what drove media coverage, in scale, scope and content, pre-election.
3 replies 5 retweets 14 likes -
Replying to @zeynep @DavidCornDC and
it isn't the media's job to run a campaign against Trump. That was Clinton's role.
18 replies 2 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @maggieNYT
Media's role was to explore unprecedented issue: conflict-of-interest, in proportion. They did email server to COI about 5 to 1.
3 replies 20 retweets 62 likes
Not arguing they should have run against Trump. On the contrary. They should have reported on key issues for Clinton AND Trump.
-
-
Replying to @zeynep
and I think media did a better job than you're allowing for. Not saying there weren't mistakes. But also, a favorite pt of some is
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @maggieNYT @zeynep
blaming NYT solely for emails. That chart you're citing has several times more coverage of it in WaPo.
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.