be willing to say the same. And I think it's clear that Trump's business conflicts did not receive sufficient attn
-
-
That doesn't even seem controversial to me. It's not nefarious, but it was a collective error.
7 replies 19 retweets 148 likes -
it also doesn't mean it's why Trump won. You don't think voters had a lot of info by Election Day?
20 replies 3 retweets 15 likes -
I literally said above I don't think it's "Why Trump won". I don't think anything I did in my coverage
13 replies 4 retweets 33 likes -
missed it. Thanks.
2 replies 1 retweet 6 likes -
Replying to @maggieNYT @chrislhayes and
Not nearly enough pre-election coverage of business ties & real & potential conflicts.
27 replies 77 retweets 233 likes -
Replying to @DavidCornDC @chrislhayes and
and you think that's why he won? That's where this thread began.
12 replies 5 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @maggieNYT @DavidCornDC and
No, issue is what drove media coverage, in scale, scope and content, pre-election.
3 replies 5 retweets 14 likes -
Replying to @zeynep @maggieNYT and
FWIW, I think social media made mass media less important; elite failure; too much+
1 reply 3 retweets 8 likes
focus on data journalism without reading its footnotes (which were ay, ay ay) and+
-
-
Replying to @zeynep @maggieNYT and
zeynep tufekci Retweeted zeynep tufekci
and Clinton campaign. I thought convention risked loss, tbh.https://twitter.com/zeynep/status/758466685435125761 …
zeynep tufekci added,
1 reply 3 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @zeynep @DavidCornDC and
Clinton was running, more or less, from mid-2014 on. Doing paid speeches + the stilted
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.