be willing to say the same. And I think it's clear that Trump's business conflicts did not receive sufficient attn
-
-
That doesn't even seem controversial to me. It's not nefarious, but it was a collective error.
7 replies 19 retweets 148 likes -
it also doesn't mean it's why Trump won. You don't think voters had a lot of info by Election Day?
20 replies 3 retweets 15 likes -
No argument that it's why Trump won. It's also obvious that media has responsibilities & effects.
2 replies 6 retweets 33 likes -
there's no argument that the media is why Trump won?
10 replies 3 retweets 6 likes -
I would strongly oppose any monocausal explanation of what a candidate won. Multi-factor.
2 replies 4 retweets 21 likes -
Replying to @zeynep @maggieNYT and
First, media didn't take Trump seriously. Didn't believe he could win. Missing the dynamics at play.
3 replies 6 retweets 27 likes -
Replying to @zeynep @maggieNYT and
Then, after he became the nominee, unprecedented business empire got too little attention+
1 reply 6 retweets 23 likes -
Replying to @zeynep @maggieNYT and
meanwhile, there was a whole slew of Clinton coverage that focused on "oh, look news", hacks, leaks+
3 replies 6 retweets 19 likes -
Replying to @zeynep @maggieNYT and
Clinton, of course, needed critical coverage. It was unbalanced & misfocused; scale, scope, content.
1 reply 3 retweets 34 likes
If anything, I wrote in March on why he was viable & strong, and media weak.http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/31/opinion/campaign-stops/adventures-in-the-trump-twittersphere.html …
-
-
Replying to @zeynep @maggieNYT and
Idea that candidate is not mainly responsible for loss is ridiculous on face.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @gtumuluri @maggieNYT and
What a partisan candidate is good at or not is not my issue here.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.